The two-week
roll-over is a great way to train for runners of all abilities as it lowers the
risk of injury, it’s more interesting, and it might be more effective than
traditional training.
In
the 1960s, Arthur Lydiard became the big name in the running community after
Peter Snell won the 800 m at the 1960 Olympics and the 800 m and 1500 m at the
1964 Olympics. What made Lydiard’s training different than many of his
contemporaries was the use of periodization. Periodization is a fancy term for
changing the training stimulus over time. Whereas Lydiard’s contemporaries were
performing daily interval training year-round, Lydiard would start with at
least 10 weeks of high-volume marathon training, followed by a concentration on
hills, then intervals, and finally coordination of race-specific qualities.
Periodization
leads to better results with a lower risk of injury, although the research
hasn’t been able to determine which method is best. There are two broad types
of periodization: conjugate and concurrent. Conjugate training focusses on developing one or two fitness qualities at a time, whereas concurrent training allows
simultaneous development of all qualities.
Pros
and Cons of Conjugate Periodization
Pros
|
Cons
|
Allows
you to maximize a fitness quality
|
Other
fitness qualities may decline substantially
|
Allows
for 1-2 peaks in fitness every year
|
You
may prefer to compete at races from spring through to fall
|
Concentrated
blocks of volume or intensity may lead to injury
|
|
Less
variation in training may be boring
|
Pros
and Cons of Concurrent Periodization
Pros
|
Cons
|
Simultaneous
development of all fitness qualities
|
May
not be able to maximize any one fitness quality
|
Allows
you to stay in good shape for months at a time
|
You
may not be able to achieve your best result in any one race
|
Allows
you to build volume or intensity more slowly, thereby lowering risk of injury
|
Development
of some qualities can interfere with the development of other qualities
|
Greater
variation in weekly training may be more interesting
|
I
prefer to mesh concurrent and conjugate training together; my runners are
usually training all qualities simultaneously but the emphasis changes over the
year. I came to this decision based on a lack of success with conjugate training.
In high school, I was always worried about losing my speed during the higher
volume phases in the winter and summer. Then, as I added speed in the spring
and fall, I would have a leap in performance only to lose the benefits of my
aerobic base as the championship meets arrived. These are typical complaints of
those who follow a conjugate program. Many reach peak performance too early and
then start sliding backward. In a concurrent or mixed system, I can train switch
my emphasis from endurance to speed to recovery based on recent results from
races or workouts.
The Two-Week Roll-Over
I
typically train following a two-week roll-over. This cycle can be repeated for
months on end and allows you to compete well at events lasting 10-90 min. For
simplicity, I’ve cut out the easy runs, but this program works best on 4-6+
runs a week.
Workout
1
|
Workout
2
|
Workout
3
|
|
Week
1
|
Tempo
Run or Cruise Intervals
|
5km
Pace Intervals OR Alterations
|
Long
Run
|
Week
2
|
Tempo
Run or Cruise Intervals
|
Hills
|
Sample
Workouts (Always precede with a warm-up)
Workout
1
Progression
Run: 20-60min progressively faster
Tempo
Run: 20-60min comfortably hard
Cruise
Intervals: 3x10min comfortably hard (2min rest)
Workout
2
5km Pace Intervals: 5x1000m at 5km
pace with 90sec rest
Alternations: 12-20min alternating
30sec at 3-5km pace with 30sec floating
Hills: 6-12 x 30sec hills with a jog
back rest
Volume
Adjustments Over Four Weeks
I
used to build my volume progressively for three weeks and then cut back by
25-33% in the fourth week like everyone else until I read Matt Dixon’s book The
Well-Built Triathlete. Dixon says that three weeks is too long to build-up
and one week is too long to deload. What happens is that training goes well on
week 1 and into week 2, but then the quality of training drops in week 3. I’ve
found that I’ve accumulated so much stress in three weeks that I feel flat and
unmotivated for the entire deload week. Instead, I reduce volume at the end of
every 2nd week by running the shorter hill workout and cutting the volume
of the long run. Over the course of four weeks (two roll-overs), my volume might
look like this:
Week
1: High (95%)
Week
2: Medium (90%)
Week
3: Very High (100%)
Week
4: Low (70-85%)
On
week 4, the volume is reduced on all easy runs and strength workouts, but I maintain
the effort on the moderate to high-intensity sessions.
Quality
Workouts Over a Year
I
always build quality workouts by extension. This means that you’re going to run
at your goal pace for a workout and extend the volume of the session, the
volume of individual intervals, or by shortening the rests between intervals.
This method has been shown to reduce the risk of injury in sprinters and I
think the idea extends to long-distance runners.
Sample
Progression for Intervals Run at 5km Pace
Workout 1: 12x400m (60sec rest)
Workout 2: 8x600m (75sec rest)
Workout 3: 6x800m (90sec rest)
Workout 4: 5x1000m (2min rest)
Sample
Progression for a Tempo Run
Workout 1: 40min at marathon pace
Workout 2: 50min at marathon pace
Workout 3: 60min at marathon pace
After
a race, drop back down and start building up. In this way, you’re not spending
the whole year crushing yourself with long intervals and tempo runs.
In
addition, the type of session and duration can be adjusted based on your next
race. Over the winter I know I don’t have any races for a while, so I can use
the two-week roll-over to focus more on aerobic development. I tend to use
alternations more than 5km pace intervals and long tempo runs over shorter
cruise intervals.
In
summary, the goal of the two-week roll-over is to add variety to your training,
minimize the risk of injury and over-training, and maximize results. Build up
volume of easy runs and higher intensity workouts slowly and drop back to
shorter sessions after a big race.
Stay
fit,

No comments:
Post a Comment