A
couple months ago I gave a presentation on running titled In Defense of Running named after Michael Pollan’s book In Defense of Food. Pollan discusses how
indigenous tribes thrive on vastly different diets, because there is one common
theme: they eat real food. In comparison I discussed how there were many
successful programs, but despite their differences there was also a common
theme: there was a lot of running involved! I thought I’d share some of the
ideas from that presentation.
There’s
a lot that we can learn from studying the science of running, but it’s not
necessary to have a strong science background in order to develop an effective
program. We have more than one hundred years of trial-and-error evidence by
thousands of coaches and millions of runners that’s easily available to anyone.
From these individuals we find that although methods vary there are several
common principles:
Consistency is the key: Long term
success in running is not determined by some amazing workout or training week
but through months and years of good and even average workouts. The best
workout you can do takes too long to recover from and can lead to injury. These
should be done sparingly.
Individualized training is great, but so
is training in a group: If we take many runners preparing for the same event
they will all have different backgrounds and different needs even if they run
the same time for that event. Thus, these runners should have some individualization
to their training. Having said that, group training has tremendous benefits
psychologically which transfers into physical improvements. The goal then is to
individualize training within the group.
All the elements of a program are
important:
It’s not all about the long run or
interval workout or high mileage.
You need to run … a lot: Yearly
increases in running duration and frequency are necessary for continued improvements
for both middle and long distance events. Training at lower intensities allows
one to recover more quickly from race specific intensities both during and
after interval training sessions.
Paula Radcliffe won World Jr XC on only 25-30mi/week, but it took 120-160mi/week to become one of the best ever.
Research
by Seiler and Tonnessen (2009) reveals that elite runners spend about 80% of
their training at below 75% maximum heart rate. While this has worked very well
for elites Esteve-Lanao wanted to know if it was applicable to recreational
runners. He found that these runners tended to run too fast on their easy days
and were therefore unable to achieve the necessary intensity on their hard
days. When Esteve-Lanao (2007) made another group strictly adhere to running
below 75% MHR on easy days they outperformed a group following a higher
intensity protocol over 10km. While some elites “hammer” their easy runs they’re
still running moderately high volumes and rarely exceeding their marathon race
pace.
Easy
runs at less than 75% maximum heart rate allow one to develop the
cardiovascular system and aerobic energy pathway, but at an intensity low
enough that it spares carbohydrate stores for race specific work. These runs
also develop fat burning capability for events over 60min. The use of a
designated long run is optional for events shorter than 60min.
Don’t forget interval training: While general
conditioning improves the capacity of your engine interval training improves
your engine’s power. This gives you a higher work rate.
For
race pace training I use race pace +/- one event. Using the 10km as an example
I use 5km to half marathon pace. For speed work I run up to two events faster
i.e. up to 3km pace for the 10km.
There
are many examples of runners that reached a world class level without interval
training. These runners will often feel that they got slower from regular
interval training. For example, Ron Clarke significantly lowered the 10 000 m
world record just by running high volume and running hard on some of those
runs. However, Clarke could never win major championships, because his engine
wasn’t powerful enough to change pace quickly. He needed interval training, but
he needed to use it sparingly to avoid breakdown.
Include some form of training to develop
the stride:
This type of work improves performance by increasing stride length, increasing
stride rate (through decreased ground contact time), and lowering energy
consumption at any particular pace (i.e. it improves running economy). The
methods used vary dramatically from program to program but may include any or
all of the following: form drills, plyometrics, weight training, hill running,
and sprinting.
Stay fit,
Jonathan Pratt
